Search for: "State v. Garcia"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2024, 6:30 am
Hemel (NYU School of Law), on Wednesday, October 30, 2024 Tags: Adams v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 11:58 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Remember United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm
See, Garcia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Supreme Court in Penry v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
Judge Wilkins, along with Judges Millet and Garcia, determined [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
At The Conversation, Ruben Garcia points to his own research in Nevada to argue that Wednesday’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Garcia, No. 07-40245 A conviction for drug-related offenses is reversed and remanded for a new trial where: 1) during rebuttal closing argument, the government improperly bolstered its key witnesses, the agents who heard defendant's unrecorded confession; and 2) such bolstering constituted reversible plain error, which seriously affected the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of the proceedings. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am
In the Court’s most recent foray, in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
In Dan-Foam A/S v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
– Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 9:06 am
Garcia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Garcia-Udall v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm
Next week in the courts On Monday 6 October 2014 judgment will be handed down by Dingemans J in the case of Garcia v Associated Newspapers (heard 21-25, 28-9 and 31 July 2014). [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 12:08 pm
Round One: In Garcia v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am
Does an operating agreement’s provision stating that “additional capital contribution may be made at such time and in such amounts as the Members shall determine” require unanimous consent of the LLC’s members, or does majority consent suffice? [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 3:38 am
” Critics charged that Walton’s public statements ran afoul of Canon 3A(6) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which states: “A judge should not make public comment on the merits of a matter pending or impending in any court. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:29 am
—Mikey Garcia [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 12:23 pm
These folks would like CA to distinguish itself from the reasoning of Garcia v. [read post]
