Search for: "State v. Hook"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,580
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
AB 52 thus provides an additional “hook” upon which project opponents may seek to hang potential CEQA claims. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch) Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat) India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force - ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for Protecting Cinematographical Creations (1993) &… [read post]
BECAUSE WE HAVE THE POWER TO FUCK OUR CLIENTS - The Jefferson Parish Indigent Defender Board Edition
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm
Castillo then asked the Court of Appeal, which looked at cases from the United States Supreme Court (Williams v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch) Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat) India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force – ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for Protecting… [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:56 am
(Hague v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch) Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat) India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force – ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for… [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 8:34 am
With penalties of $500 per fax, and 14 faxes sent, that put Bluestone on the hook for $7,000. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat) … [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:44 pm
That’s the question the Illinois Supreme Court debated during its November term in Illinois State Bar Association Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
The State charged Respondent under Nev. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:33 pm
Last year, Judge Mark Bernstein in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas had a long, scholarly analysis of the state of privilege law in the Kolar v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 9:05 am
In Rose v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:01 am
Zenith Radio Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 5:10 am
The Supreme Court made matters worse in Pearson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
On the heels of Patel v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Surveillance Privacy advocates are worried about the use of surveillance technology to track women seeking abortions in US states that have banned and restricted the procedure following the Supreme Court decision which overturned Roe v Wade. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 11:12 am
" People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am
Reworks a hook from another song and delivers it w/same melody and turns it violent. [read post]
