Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
See People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:23 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
In both cases, the courts recognized that although the stolen property did not belong to the respective employees, that as agents of their employers, the employees were in constructive possession of the property and were victims of both the theft and the robbery. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:08 am
Rather than present an entire meal, we’re dishing out a few items from our tasting menu. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
and 7 U.S.C. 2321 et seq.), in consultation with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, submit a report to the Chair of the White House Competition Council, enumerating and describing any relevant concerns of the Department of Agriculture and strategies for addressing those concerns across intellectual property, antitrust, and other relevant laws. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:54 am
Wunsch's position that in the agreement the parties specifically stated how each item of property would be divided, sold or otherwise disposed of, more persuasive. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
’United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 12:20 pm
" U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
Hull and Peter Charles Hoffer, Roe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Steinhardt.Steinhardt, a prolific collector of archaeological material whose name is synonymous with cultural property cases like U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:32 am
As Amazon is not to be seen under items I to V, Amazon does not fall under vi. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 6:40 pm
Personal Property Law § 500 et. seq. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am
In State v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
” “”An account stated is an agreement between the parties to an account based upon prior transactions between them with respect to the correctness of the separate items composing the account and the balance due, if any, in favor of one party or the other” (Shea & Gould v Burr, 194 AD2d 369, 370 [1st Dept 1993] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Court held in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 9:45 pm
” (Italics added.)]; United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:51 pm
According to the Court, only restrictions that concern the specific subject matter of intellectual property could be admitted to curtail the free movement of goods (see Deutsche Grammophon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:09 am
Section 6-3-402(a) states that anyone who “steals, takes and carries, leads or drives away property of another with intent to deprive the owner or lawful possessor is guilty of larceny. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 6:14 pm
See Gallegos v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am
It cannot be signed by someone under a power of attorney (St Ermins Property Company Ltd v Tingay [2002] EWHC 1673 (Ch); [2002] HLR 11) or any agency agreement (Cascades & Quayside Ltd v Cascades Freehold Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1555; [2008] L&TR 23). [read post]
