Search for: "State v. Jacobs" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
However, the Apple v Samsung cases pending before several national courts in Europe expose the inherent limitations of such provisions. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Will Bland
Last month the First Judicial District Court of Appeal for Illinois reached its opinion in Ballard v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am by JB
That is the justification often offered for cases like Griswold and Lawrence.Because of two early decisions, the Slaughterhouse Cases and United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:26 pm
Professor Sir Robin Jacob chaired a debate (organised by the AIPPI) between Prof. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Calabresi, Jacobs and Pooler) resolves this case on the basis of the state of the law at the time of Gutierrez's conviction. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 7:59 am by Allison Trzop
” At The Originalism Blog, Chris Green discusses whether the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group has standing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am by Charon QC
Applying to federal enclaves only (of which the District of Columbia is one), it was affirmed in 2010 with respect to the states in McDonald-v-Chicago. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
As a result he referred a number of questions to the CJEU.Parallel importation  In Advocate General Jacobs opinion in Joined Cases C-143/00 and C-443/99 Boehringer Ingelheim KG & Ors v Swingward Ltd & Ors [2003] Ch 27 (Boehringer I) he stated that the notice requirement in Condition 5 dated from the Hoffmann-La Roche & Co AG v Centrafarm Bertriebsgesellschaft Pharmazeutischer Erezeugnisse mBH [1978] ECHR 1139 where that Court explained that the… [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by Florian Mueller
Let me quote two paragraphs from one of Judge Koh's claim construction orders in Apple v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:22 am by Sheppard Mullin
Ct. 1740 (2011) (holding that a class action waiver in an arbitration agreement was enforceable because the FAA preempts state law); Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
  Sir Robin Jacob (who retired from the Court of Appeal last year but was making one of his occasional reappearances) in giving the leading judgment noted Lord Nicholls in Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] AC 284, p.308: “The court may grant an injunction against a party properly before it where this is required to avoid injustice […] The court habitually grants injunctions in respect of certain types of conduct. [read post]