Search for: "State v. Light" Results 1261 - 1280 of 25,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Whilst this does have a bearing upon Mrs Justice Pauffley's decision, it is not central, and I shall therefore concentrate on the essential facts, which can be stated briefly:1. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 5:20 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The rule of law, as observed in Roncarelli v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:00 pm by ADR Times
District Court Says Consumer Can’t Be Forced into AT&T Arbitration San Francisco Chronicle May 25, 2011 In light of the AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:16 am by Eric Goldman
In light of the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution, the appeals court came back to this open item. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 1:00 am by Sarah McKeeve, Brodies LLP
Factual background The appellant, Mr Charles McCann has been detained as a patient of the State Hospital, Carstairs since the mid-1990s. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:44 pm by Sme
Berryhill (10th Cir., July 10, 2017) (affirming denial of social security benefits because, while Scott suffered from severe impairments, she retained the residual capacity to perform light work) *Olson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
Last week’s online symposium reflected various perspectives on how the Supreme Court is likely to rule on Arizona’s S.B. 1070 in light of its recent decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:52 pm by totmauthor
  Two recent cases shed light on how the Supreme Court might view my collective reading of NAACP v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm by Lisa Whittaker
Scott states that James could return to "light duty" on May 10, 2007. [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:52 pm by John Hempill and Karl Buhler
This is an issue that actually dates back to the seminal 2005 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit in Consolidated Edison, Inc. v. [read post]