Search for: "State v. Russell"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
9 May 2020, 4:16 pm
” Blisset v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:18 am
2004) “[I]ncarceration, as a foreseeable result of criminal activity, does not ipso facto relieve one of the obligation to pay child support” Meyer v. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 5:29 am
Troxel v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 11:17 am
” People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
Briefly: For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary on Monday’s opinion in DIRECTV v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am
California and United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
Let’s start with United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Title: Judulang v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:56 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represented the petitioners in the case.] [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 12:28 pm
Federal Communications CommissionDocket: 10-189Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals violated Supreme Court precedent by upholding a ruling allowing the Federal Communications Commission to set rates for local intrastate communications by replacing those state rates with a mandatory interstate rate.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (DC Circuit)Petition for certiorari Akin Gump and Howe & Russell serve as counsel in the following case, which is listed without regard to… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on Glossip v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:01 am
Abraham v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
Bank v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 3:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 12:08 am
In today’s case (Dizon v. [read post]
