Search for: "State v. Shell"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
In addition “treaty shopping” can be practiced by claimants possessing the nationality of the host country itself by way of the incorporation of a “shell company” in a country that has an investment protection agreement with the host country. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
No trade dress this time.This first Apple v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
Kyiv also requested access to sophisticated air defenses to help protect vulnerable citizens from relentless shelling. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
See also United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:08 am
Ag Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
There is a long history of pirate websites locating themselves outside of the United States but marketing themselves to U.S. users in a deceptive manner that makes it difficult for consumers, including both consumers and brands, to distinguish an illegitimate site from a legitimate one. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:27 pm
Id. at *5-6 (citing Weedon v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm
The Transfers In the parties’ agreement (read here), Gallo and Sweet Revenge expressly represented and warranted that Gallo “created and/or wrote the Story as an employee-for-hire” of Sweet Revenge, and that the story “constitutes a work-made-for-hire pursuant to the United States Copyright Laws. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:38 am
A recent case, Roseton OL LLC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:34 am
United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm
In 2014, for instance, a DOL investigation resulted in Shell Oil Co. and Motiva Enterprises LLC, which markets Shell gasoline and other products, agreeing to pay $4,470,764 in overtime back wages to 2,677 current and former chemical and refinery employees to settle DOL charges that the companies violated FLSA overtime provisions by not paying workers for the time spent at mandatory pre-shift meetings and failing to record the time spent at these meetings. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
E.g., Matthews v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:33 am
After Bridge v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
On a recent celebratory birthday call, members of IP Federation (which today include BT, Dyson, GSK, Pfizer, Ocado, Arm, Microsoft, IBM, Rolls-Royce, Shell, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ford and Eli Lilly) shared memories of their work, triumphs and tribulations. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:35 am
But is it a city, or is it merely the shell of a city, a mask for a judicial fiefdom? [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
” And while BP, Shell and ConocoPhillips have joined the United States Climate Action Partnership, which is lobbying for mandatory carbon limits, and are investing in renewable energy sources like wind, solar and biofuels, ExxonMobil remains coy about which, if any, carbon constraints it would support and has stated unequivocally that the company will not be putting money into renewables. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am
And that just covers the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:30 am
Shell Pipeline Co., LP, 2008 WL 6468611 (E.D. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
