Search for: "State v. Syed"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2012, 1:50 pm
See Truswal Sys. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
., LP v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm
Multidata Sys. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:57 am
Data Sys. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 3:35 pm
Tims v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 6:58 am
Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 7:40 am
Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993). [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:15 am
Sys. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 12:55 pm
State Coll. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
The court stated that it did not need to decide whether liability existed under the prong 1 claim to dispose of the motion to dismiss, but noted that a report prepared by external counsel indicated that the company had a “woefully inadequate compliance system. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:39 am
See Aptix Corp. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:54 pm
., the Mipo entities) that eventually import them into the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:52 pm
Electronic Corp. v. [read post]
