Search for: "State v. Welcome"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 6,373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
WETLANDS United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 3:00 pm
Supreme Court in Tanzin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 10:07 pm
The article discusses the divergences between various states in their interpretation of CJEU jurisprudence and the importance of the – then – upcoming judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 1:27 pm
In General Medicine, P.C. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm
We have had 450,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and the Philippines making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 9:28 pm
V. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 9:57 am
Comments, reactions, engagements always welcome. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:00 am
In Itility LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
The moving and opposition briefs were filed before the United States Supreme Court entered an injunction pendente lite in the case of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Judgments which treat this idea with kindness, or at least do not dismiss it out of hand, are to be welcomed[20]. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am
On 11 December 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in Mastercard v Merricks, dismissing Mastercard’s appeal. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm
The question this time, in Facebook v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:53 pm
In early 2017, following complaints over IHAT’s duration and expense, the UK Secretary of State for Defence announced that IHAT would be closed. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am
Ultimately, the Court of Appeal’s effort at balancing effective enforcement of intellectual property rights with protecting the interests of honest commercial persons is welcomed. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:08 pm
Several state Attorneys General challenged the new regulation in New York et al v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 7:29 am
This is true in most states, including Florida. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 7:29 am
As always, I welcome your comments below. [read post]
