Search for: "State v. Wells" Results 1261 - 1280 of 67,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
That's because state courts have well established that they have jurisdiction over the incidents that occur on their roads. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
But because a “trial court is not bound by the nomenclature used by a party […], the trial court could treat [a motion to suppress] as a motion in limine” State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
The Supreme Court confronted this issue in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:24 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The correct approach is to follow the guidance which was stated to be “authoritative” in KO (Nigeria), namely the direction in the Upper Tribunal case of MK (Sierra Leone) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] INLR 563 (“MK”). [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am by Robert Hougham
Coming soon… Max Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 3:42 am
This month's discussion comes from a very well written article in the Tennessee Bar Journal. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 6:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The state has authority to sue municipalities over civil rights violations if it can show the lawsuit promotes the state's interest in the health and well-being, both physical and economic, of its residents in general. [read post]