Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 40,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
See State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:34 am
(See Bruni v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:06 am
SEC staff have previously denied no-action requests seeking to exclude similar proposals (Exxon Mobil Corporation v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:55 am
For example, the provision detailing the powers of search and seizure of information stored in a digital device (paragraph 4 of Article 28) is worded in a way that may result in States imposing obligations upon telecommunications and internet service providers to either disclose vulnerabilities of certain software or to provide relevant authorities with access to encrypted communications. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
”In other words, that slapped that case, against the slapping nurse, shut.# # #DECISIONMatter of D. v Z. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, 484 U.S. 19 (1987). [14] United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
The case is called O’Donnell v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 2:49 am
Intel also requested a referral to the EBA on the question of whether it was justified to force an applicant to delete parts of the description solely due to the wording being identified by the examining division as "claim-like". [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
We consider that this simply means that the word ‘poppadom’ is not a protected term. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:46 pm
In Parque Towers Developers, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:58 am
Making videos of small animals being crushed by high heels may be protected First Amendment activity (really, see United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
by Dennis Crouch In Roku, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
All costs identified specifically with a particular contract are direct costs of that contract and the contractor must charge them directly to the contract.[5] All costs identified specifically with other final cost objectives are direct costs of those cost objectives and the contractor must not charge them to the contract either directly or indirectly.[6] However, for reasons of practicality, a contractor may treat any direct cost of a minor dollar amount as an indirect cost if the contractor… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:32 am
Rampart Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:15 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
In the arguments, the justices focused little on the facts of the current case, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
