Search for: "Steel v. Steel" Results 1261 - 1280 of 3,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2016, 3:52 am
April 6, 2016 - 2 PM: In re Openings, Serial No. 86044043 [Section 2(e)(5) functionality refusal of the product configuration shown below, comprising a U-shaped channel that runs the full length of a door at its top and bottom, for "metal doors, commercial reinforced steel doors" and for "non-metal doors"].April 7, 2016 - 10:15 AM [ABA Annual IP Law Conference, Bethesda, Maryland]: Nash-Finch Company v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:46 am
  She ruled that the defendant landowner was responsible to return the neighbouring landowner to the position it was in prior to the wrong committed.The plaintiff landowner advanced its claims on the basis of the doctrine in Rylands v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 5:21 pm by Adam Santucci
As such, in accordance with the Supreme Court of the United States' holding in New Process Steel v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:42 am
In 1998, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued a decision in the matter of Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hetronic argued that these were “essential steps” towards US sales, as in Steele v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 10:23 am by Kenan Farrell
Steele filed an appearance on behalf of all defendants and requested an extension of time to file an answer. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:33 am by Joost Pauwelyn
  Streamlining Tuna with Cloves, in both cases we now have:  (1) a finding of discrimination (cloves v. menthols in Cloves; stricter labeling requirements in the ETP v. outside the ETP in Tuna) and  (2) a finding that the ban on cloves / strict labeling requirements in the ETP are not more trade restrictive than necessary. [read post]