Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The state’s highest court affirmed. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The state’s highest court affirmed. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:08 am
The High Court’s judgment spectacularly ducks this more important and salient question. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:17 am
Because the Supreme Court was conservative. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:23 am
I would like to extract certain observations of the Supreme Court in P.A.INAMDAR & Ors. vs. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 5:47 pm
Doubts and Prospects upon the Characteristic of Loan of Consumption of Natural Persons in Chinese law Wang Jing, University of Rome Tor Vergata – Faculty of Law AULA 6 -- Criminal Justice and Human Rights (1/2)Chair: Flora Sapio ‘Big-stick 306’ – Prosecution and Sanctioning of Criminal Defense Lawyers in China under Article 306 of the Criminal Law Alexandra Kaiser, University of Cologne Reassessing the Requisite State of Mind for the Offence of Money… [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear al-Marri's challenge of his detention. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 6:38 am
For example, the editors of The Post went out of their way to make sure that everyone thinks of adding seats to the Supreme Court as "court packing," with at most a tut-tutting mention of how the Republicans packed the current Court (and never, of course, using that dreaded phrase to describe Mitch McConnell's handiwork).What makes The Times so problematic? [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 1:09 pm
In Zani, ironically, the CCA already understood that proponent's claims had been seriously challenged: The majority opinion observed that:Proponents of the use of hypnosis to restore a crime victim's memory to facilitate his trial testimony, most notable of whom is Dr. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
After the California Supreme Court’s opinion in Barrett v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:35 pm
"Actual damages," the court observed, clearly refers to pecuniary harm, which is plainly recoverable under the CLRA. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:10 am
Indeed, in the death penalty's most recent experience in the United States Supreme Court it was met with a somewhat callous approach by a majority of the members of the Court. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 2:16 pm
It's time to make our markets strong again. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:26 am
The Supreme Court had granted the College summary judgment declaring that plaintiff's marriage was not entitled to recognition in New York and that the College did not violate the Equal Protection Clause or Executive Law § 296. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:32 pm
Supreme Court has said that under the 5th Amendment, the relevant parcel is the entire parcel, not just the portion of it that's affected by the regulation. [read post]
1 May 2007, 9:19 pm
Here too, jaded observers might say that the Court's goal was to minimize criticism for the low number of decisions of the Term, which will still produce 71 rulings after argument, a modern low. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:57 am
In this regard, the Shafer court relied, in part, on Rutzinski, in which the Wisconsin Supreme Court cited the following passage from State v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:58 pm
We've internalized the idea that if the Supreme Court does something, that means it's not illegal, even if it's exactly the opposite of what the Court did just a few years before.The Supreme Court Historical Society sponsors an indoctrination site for schoolchildren, which includes Nixon's infamous line and offers this suggested discussion topic:It has… [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 12:53 pm
Brookins, 290 So. 3d 1100, 1104 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) ("Our supreme court has observed that the odor of burnt marijuana emanating from a vehicle—like we have here—provides probable cause to search each of the vehicle's occupants. [read post]
