Search for: "T THOMAS"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 23,479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 12:39 pm
.'"] From Justice Alito's statement today respecting the denial of certiorari, joined by Justice Thomas, in Thompson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:24 am
” “Disagreement,” Waggoner continued, “isn’t discrimination, and the government can’t mislabel speech as discrimination to censor it. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:42 am
The girlfriend isn’t charged with wrongdoing. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal How Judges Navigate Offers of Free Lunch, Trips and NBA Tickets Bloomberg Law – Zoe Tillman (Bloomberg News) | Published: 6/25/2023 Recent controversies over perks accepted by Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have raised questions not only about the justices’ conduct off the bench and what they disclose to the public, but also about how the judiciary broadly enforces ethics. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:09 am
“You spoken to Fire Chief Thomas lately, Sheriff? [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:01 am
And I didn't even get to read Groff or Counterman yet. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:46 pm
Six pages in to the court's questioning, the judge asked Mother, "Now, what other reasons do you believe—what other facts do you have that would indicate I wouldn't be fair? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
However, only Thomas was willing to join Gorsuch's concurring opinion on this point. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:34 am
The plaintiff's counsel and the Thomas More Society are entitled to their beliefs. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:36 am
I had initially assumed that this reflected the large number of colleges that don't really have selective admissions, and partly it does, but according to the Respondents' Brief, where this figure comes from, even 40% of relative selective colleges don't use race in admissions. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
When it comes to race, however, the Chief ain't evolving. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
“Harvard’s view about when [race-based admissions will end] doesn’t have a date on it. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am
But actually, only Justices Thomas and Gorsuch embraced the theory. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
Barrett and Thomas dissented. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
As I discussed in a preview of the Mallory decision, Gorsuch and Thomas in that case found the balancing approach required by the dormant Commerce Clause jurisprudence to simply be infeasible. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
What we've learned is that there's a limit, and the Supreme Court won't tell us exactly what it is. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:04 pm
I won't even attempt to describe the tortured legal posture of this case. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:21 pm
first appeared on Thomas W Galvani, PC. [read post]
