Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 4,764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2012, 2:51 pm
Tangled v Tangled Up ‘Tangled’ is another computer-animated fantasy film produced by Disney, though unlike 'Brave' it's a musical comedy. [read post]
17 May 2018, 12:37 pm
" Court orders addressed to third parties (chiefly in libel cases): Here too Google generally has no legal obligation to deindex material—if you sue me for libel and get an injunction finding that my page libeled you and that I must remove it, that generally doesn't bind Google (though the Hassell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:08 pm
Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Consumer Depot, Abramson v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 4:05 pm
Note: we already knew that 230 protects search engines from liability for their search results snippets when IP claims aren't involved. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:57 am
I hadn't even gone to law school yet, and I was in charge of setting it up. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 4:25 am
It is the only way that consumers will realize what is at stake with patent law as is. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:00 pm
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am
If you are not a consumer of cloud storage services, you would undoubtedly not be happy to pay for them either. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 1:19 am
If you are not a consumer of cloud storage services, you would undoubtedly not be happy to pay for them either. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm
Id. at *16-17.The Hale court then considered plaintiffs’ claim of violation of state consumer protection laws. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:33 am
PSK, LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:38 am
The court got rid of the New Jersey consumer protection law claims because NJ’s law doesn’t protect competitors, but did allow some claims under the Lanham Act and the New Jersey Fair Trade Act. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 1:08 am
Spice up your bookshelves with this volume! [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
The various parts of section 2 very much depend on that if the interest at stake is only consumer understanding/confusion—e.g., prohibition on registration of flags & insignia.Separately, could dilution survive b/c confusion isn’t the only interest the gov’t is allowed to protect? [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:30 pm
The total count for posts on the LexBlog Network today hits 134 and, while that probably doesn't crack the top 10 all time, this is one of the stronger round-ups quantity-wise that I've seen in awhile. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Lyons v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 1:46 pm
PeaceHealth v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:27 am
In this blog post, I'll catch up on three recent cases: Friendfinder Doe v. [read post]
