Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
  Thus, this bill would overrule the California Supreme Court in Chavez v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:51 am by Matt Bartus
UPS (California 2009). $12.8 million settlement for misclassification of delivery drivers Gardner v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:24 am by Russ Bensing
They don’t take anything seriously. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Garland did not take a formal position on the merits of the case. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:12 am by Mandelman
I’m writing about it again now, because the story just keeps getting worse, and it’s reached the point where it’s become constitutionally offensive, and should be horrifying to every citizen of these United States, and certainly to every resident of Orange County, California. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
I am also taking the short-term view, looking at only how Justice Stevens’ successor might vote differently from him in close cases. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm by Jon Sands
The 9th held that California law applies because the state law is interpreted to apply when any partial execution of the offense occurs with the state's jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:39 am by Susan Brenner
He also used Ramirez's identity to obtain a California identification card, birth certificate, and Social Security card, all of which were issued in Ramirez's name. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:58 pm by Rick
The Court also notes that in United States v. [read post]