Search for: "The California Department of Corrections" Results 1261 - 1280 of 3,955
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 11:37 am by Kent Scheidegger
Proposition 66, approved by the people of California in 2016, eliminated the requirement that execution protocols be established through the lengthy and cumbersome Administrative Procedure Act process.On January 30, the California Department of Corrections announced a new protocol (see this post) and sent it to the Office of Administrative Law for publication under the "File and Print" procedure, which does not involve substantive OAL review or a public… [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 17-1003. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:23 am by Deanna Forbush, Clark Hill
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), shifted the focus of its worksite enforcement strategy from arresting employees to arresting employers. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:23 am by Deanna Forbush, Clark Hill
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), shifted the focus of its worksite enforcement strategy from arresting employees to arresting employers. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:23 am by Deanna Forbush, Clark Hill
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), shifted the focus of its worksite enforcement strategy from arresting employees to arresting employers. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:23 am by Deanna Forbush, Clark Hill
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), shifted the focus of its worksite enforcement strategy from arresting employees to arresting employers. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:21 am by Amy Howe
The justices will now weigh in on which interpretation of the ADEA is correct. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Keith E. Whittington
In California, Judge William Alsup determined that the administration was working on a “flawed legal premise” that DACA was inconsistent with Congress’s statutory scheme for immigration. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by eileen peck
He also indicated that the State Corrections Department would need to define which specific offenses fall into the allowable exclusion. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
We determine the correct defense strategy based on the facts pertaining to your case. [read post]
On February 1, 2018, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) released its much anticipated determination regarding the local governments that are now subject to streamlined entitlements for housing development under Senate Bill 35. [read post]
On February 1, 2018, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) released its much anticipated determination regarding the local governments that are now subject to streamlined entitlements for housing development under Senate Bill 35. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 5:23 am by Cannabis Law Group
LA Police Department has raided eight businesses without licenses, leading to more than 35 arrests. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Garcia is an outspoken leader of the #MeToo movement in California. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Josh Blackman
First, in January, Judge William Alsup of the northern district of California engaged in what I described as an “an amateur act of punditry. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:24 am by Brian Schield
The California Department of Labor has developed a template for this Notice to Employees that can be found at: http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSE/LC_90.2_EE_Notice.pdf Upon reasonable request, provide an “affected employee” with a copy of the Notice of Inspection. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:30 am by John K. Ross
In wake of fatal Tulsa, Okla. police shooting, man posts messages to the police department's online complaint form asserting that officers and their families will be killed. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by News Desk
A rose by another name is not safe to eatJames Wong, a botanist in the United Kingdom, outed a California vegan blogger for decorating food with poisonous flowers. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:52 am by Peter Breslauer
“While the district court was correct that it need not consider litigation management issues in determining whether to certify a class, the Rule 23(b)(3) predominance inquiry focuses on whether common questions outweigh individual questions, an issue that preexists any settlement. [read post]