Search for: "US v. London"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 3,700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2023, 7:48 am
In 1863, in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 12:18 pm
City of New London. [read post]
5 May 2023, 7:48 am
In 1863, in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
The waiting begins.Postponed assured trespassers verdict soon(ish).Permanent trespassers and enforceable possession orders.More on London & Quadrant v AnsellWhite v Knowsley - Court of Appeal JudgmentReincarnation of Tenancy? [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:08 am
The Review Panel is due to publish its final set of proposals as an interim report, in the spring.Meanwhile, worrying news for divorce lawyers: we were informed that the divorce rate had fallen to its lowest in 29 years.FebruaryTo compliment that last item, February brought us the news that marriage rates were the lowest since they were first calculated in 1862.There was no shortage of care applications, however, with a rise of 43% in 2009, this largely being the cause of Cafcass being in… [read post]
13 May 2007, 10:26 am
The BigLaw examples included were drawn from the Large US Law Firm Branded Blogs and RSS Feeds that Joy London and I maintain. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 3:07 pm
And Faulkner Press v Class Notes is one of them. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
The introductory bars are used as mobile phone ring tones. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
City of New London (2005): "I join the opinion for the Court and add these further observations. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 6:07 am
For example, there's Andreas v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:53 am
Boxing Brands Ltd v Sports Direct International plc and other companies [2013] EWHC 2200 (Ch), a Chancery Division decision from Mr Justice Birss on 25 July, is the latest boxing-brand litigation to hit the headlines. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
KG, Jeremy hosts another analysis of that ruling written by Daniel Wise (Carpmaels & Ransford, London).* The EU patent package: a dangerous precedent? [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 6:32 am
In the alternative Fresh Trading claimed that due to the passage of time, estoppel equally prevented Deepend from acting against use of the mark. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 1:43 pm
In US law, on the contrary, in the aftermath of eBay v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney was heard on the 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Tipton Eastern District of Kentucky at London 08a0400n.06 2008/07/02 United States Surety Company v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:24 am
Talking of events, the next JIPLP-GRUR London seminar, on IP Enforcement in the wake of the IP Enforcement Directive,, is coming up on 8 September: more than 60 people have now registered, but there's still room for more. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:45 pm
I’m not doing reports but the cases are: Liverpool City Council, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hillingdon [2008] EWHC 1702 (Admin) on when and more specifically where a local authority’s duty to a ‘vulnerable young person’ arise under Children Act 1989. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 10:26 am
The validity of US patents decided by US courts. [read post]
