Search for: "US v. Shields"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 4,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 3:41 pm
Rassbach pointed to some of the roles described in the court’s 2012 ruling in Hosanna-Tabor Lutheran Church v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:57 am
" Historically, under Saucier v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:19 pm
[Kelly v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:00 am
As always, tweet your questions to @PreetBharara with hashtag #askpreet, email us at staytuned@cafe.com, or call 669-247-7338 to leave a voicemail. [read post]
German Federal Agencies Publish Privacy and IT Security Requirements for Digital Health Applications
7 May 2020, 12:04 am
Patients’ data may be used by digital health application developers only for the following purposes: to enable use of the digital health application and for reimbursement process; to prove the benefit of the application (in the framework of specific provisions of Book V of the Social Security Code); to ensure, on an ongoing basis, the technical functionality, user-friendliness and further development of the application, although patients must have the option to… [read post]
6 May 2020, 10:53 am
Consider and address the risks of allowing employees to access organizational resources using company computers/devices v. personal (BYOD) computers/devices. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:28 am
The first is Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:26 pm
Use of section 1498 therefore enables the government immediately to achieve various public benefits—lowering prices, expanding supply, and shielding socially beneficial activity (such as diagnostic testing) from liability risk or injunctive exclusion. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
Defamation * Lokhova v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 4:20 pm
Hale's order in Maryville Baptist Church, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:42 am
Next week, in Barr v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 5:46 pm
See US v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 6:54 pm
Hickman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 6:54 pm
Hickman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:17 am
* Clarks v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
The Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that municipal bond powerhouse Nuveen LLC improperly used “lies” and “threats” in a successful campaign to damage the business of much smaller rival Preston Hollow Capital LLC but it declined to enjoin the alleged wrongs because Nuveen had discontinued them in Preston Hollow Capital LLC v. [read post]
