Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm
United States Three Russians named in the Trump dossier are suing the private investigation firm Fusion GPS for libel over the handling of the dossier. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:00 am
Global - Patents Open Innovation Network unveils Linux Defenders to protect open source from patent suits by establishing prior art and participating in patent peer review (Ars Technica) (Securing Innovation) Bulgaria RARBG, ArenaBG and other BitTorrent trackers forced to shut down or relocate following police action (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) Cameroon Third-level domain names come to Cameroon (Afro-IP) Canada Copyright Board… [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 5:09 pm
In Copperweld Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm
State, the defendant was convicted and sentenced as a GORT (trivia Q- which classic SCFI movie from the 50's has a robot named Gort? [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:34 pm
In Broke Ass Phone v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:13 pm
In the classic case of Loretto v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
The FCC proposes a split-the-difference alternative that is a classic Office of the Solicitor General move: Vacate the judgment and send it back to the D.C. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on April 2, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm
Dieter Martiny: “Lex rei sitae as a connecting factor in EU Private International Law” – the English abstract reads as follows: The situs rule is one of the classic connecting principles in private international law, particularly for property law. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Supreme Court recently explained the nature of facial challenges:Under United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Supreme Court recently explained the nature of facial challenges:Under United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:50 am
It is imposed as a positive duty on the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:15 am
Manson, Graham v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
Const., art I, § 3, cl. 1 (“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State . . . [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 1:50 pm
In 1934, the famed jurist Learned Hand once offered this classic definition of tax avoidance in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
CalPERS explained that the recent federal district court decision (State of California v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
First, Gitlow v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:39 am
Here, according to the court, is how the case arose: [Alberto] Maciel is a Mexican citizen who had been living in the United States under the stolen identity of Ramon Ramirez, a man with whom Maciel was not acquainted. [read post]
