Search for: "United States v. Davis" Results 1261 - 1280 of 3,035
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2011, 3:35 am
United States resurrected the debate over the future of the exclusionary rule in American criminal procedur... 02/23/2011 | Reasonable Remedies and (or?) [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As I noted last week and major news outlets have also reported, the United States Supreme Court is poised next week to consider taking up the North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering case involving the so-called Independent-State- Legislature (ISL) theory. [read post]
25 May 2018, 11:00 am by Aurora Barnes
Garza 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am by Wolfgang Demino
 LUCINDA VINE; KRISTY POND, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.PLS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; PLS LOAN STORE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellants.No. 16-50847.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.Filed May 19, 2017.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:16-CV-31.Before: BARKSDALE, GRAVES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.[*]Appellants PLS Financial Services, Inc., and PLS Loan Store of… [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm by Dan Stein
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
Look at what happened to her: she was sent to jail for obeying her religious duty (because she is a Christian, and not just because she swore on a Bible) to honor the oath she swore (“so help me God”), on taking office, to uphold both the Kentucky and the United States Constitutions. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 8:16 am
  Meanwhile, you have been assigned to work on the case of State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:33 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
Even if this judgment is wrong, the United States has compelling interests in sustaining the mandate and this accommodation. [read post]