Search for: "United States v. Dean" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2009, 10:30 am
This is the court, remember, that directly and deliberately defied the United States Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 12:10 pm
UNITED STATES (No. 08-5274) United States Supreme Court Opinion Decided: April 29, 2009 Petitioner Dean was convicted of conspiring to commit a bank robbery and discharging a firearm during an armed robbery. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:57 am
The announcement today that Associate Justice David Souter was planning to retire from the United States Supreme Court was unlikely to shift the balance of the court on LGBT legal issues. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 7:29 am
  In January, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States concerning the pending cert petition in CNN, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:23 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
Dean’s gun accidentally discharged during a bank robbery, but no one was harmed. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 7:10 am
The Court has released the opinion in Dean v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The head of the Manhattan DA's elder abuse unit said Marshall and lawyer Francis X. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
 Why did Sebastien Boucher waive his Miranda  rights and then even use his password to show police around the child pornography-containing Z-drive of the laptop computer they seized on his entry to the United States from Canada, where he is a citizen? [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:52 pm
  And before anybody despairs too much the business climate here, we should remember that this has been a hotbed of economic activity involving semiconductors, software and the internet, which in many ways have been the crown jewels of economic developement in the United States for quite a number of years. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:57 pm
Dean Chemerinsky:   "I've been teaching Constitutional law for 29 years, and until this case, I'd never heard of the ‘implied dormant foreign affairs power of the President.'" Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]