Search for: "United States v. Guest"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 2,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
And, similarly, that enemy aliens resident outside the United States, even if they were civilians rather than combatants, had under prior law no right to access the nation’s courts during wartime. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 14/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
On Wednesday 23rd February, judgment will be handed down in Craig (AP) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, on appeal from [2020] HCJAC 22. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:59 am
In the following guest post, Paul A. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Golan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:30 am
by Jeremy Clare The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the district court exceeded its authority under 9 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 4:39 am
Download Stallings.pdf Guest bloggers [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals enunciated a bright-line rule in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:38 am
The precedent is United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 8:31 am
Also, one of Apple's prayers for relief relates to injunctions: it asks the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to order an anti-suit injunction against Acacia and Conversant. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
This time round it's patent attorney Suleman Ali (Holly IP), who has been taking another look at life in the United States in the wake of that great nation's Guidance on Eligibility. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:01 am
Guest Post by Stephen C. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:16 am
The pending Supreme Court case King v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
As every blogger will agree, "thank goodness for guest bloggers! [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Quinn, in which the Court will consider whether a group of home health care workers funded by Medicaid are state employees and therefore required to pay their “fair share” of the costs of union representation, continues with a guest post from Ann Hodges, who argues that the case “has the potential to knock out one of the pillars under the carefully balanced labor law system in the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:22 am
On 27 July 2022, in RT France v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm
K-V Pharm. [read post]
