Search for: "United States v. Wade" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2011, 7:25 am by Ronald Collins
Previous works describing the Court and its history ran in excess of 300 pages – consider, for example, Fred Rodell’s Nine Men: A Political History of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1790-1955 (1955). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am by Kevin Johnson
Holder, the United States seeks to remove from the United States a lawful permanent resident who has lived here since 1974, because he was convicted of voluntary manslaughter in 1989. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:13 am by WSLL
A trial court’s duty to insure that a defendant understands the consequences of a guilty plea before he enters one extends only to direct consequences of such a plea.In addition, the United States Supreme Court, in Iowa v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
A recent United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit case discusses what a passenger should or should not expect to be warned about by the cruise line. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 12:22 pm by John Richards
Wade, which legalized abortion in the United States, is responsible for reducing the crime rate. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:44 am by Paul Horwitz
 Proportionality strikes me as worth considering in preference to the arid absolutism that seems to have taken hold of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:27 am by David Bernstein
” A Canadian judge assured me that this requirement of “proportionality,” as various European constitutions with a similar principle refer to it, is invoked constantly and forms the basis for Canadian constitutional interpretation.Proportionality strikes me as worth considering in preference to the arid absolutism that seems to have taken hold of the United States Supreme Court.Greenhouse is alluding primarily to the Court’s recent First Amendment cases, but… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:41 am by Russell Beck
Well, on July 1, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, waded into the controversy. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:53 am by Thom Cooper
Giardi, 680 A.2nd 113 (Conn. 1996): “[W]e are required to wade once again into the virtually impenetrable ‘Serbonian bog’ of federal and state laws governing the Medicaid system. [read post]