Search for: "WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 4,153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
The court pointed out that the Wisconsin law caps the tort liability of a public employee at $50,000 per victim. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 11:17 am
Beres/absenteeism at the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Part 1 Beres, agency deference, and Lochnerism, Part 2 TetraTech: Agency discretion and “process” Beres: Agency discretion to undo a statutory scheme Making factual findings subject to never-ending review: Wisconsin Bell Agency deference and a quick note on the briefs Oral arguments over agency deference On 26 June 2018, the Wisconsin Supreme Court delivered its decision in DWD v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:27 am
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Molson Coors Beverage Co. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:41 am
A guest blog today, from Judge Ralph Adam Fine, who has been sitting on Wisconsin’s Court of Appeals since 1988, and was a trial judge for 10 years before that. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:05 pm
Motorola Mobility FRAND contract lawsuit in Wisconsin will be appealed, but a more important FRAND decision -- Judge Posner's ruling on the critical issue of injunctive relief, dismissing Motorola's related claims -- is already on appeal. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:22 pm
FEC in 2003, but the Court ruled last year in Wisconsin Right to Life v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:53 pm
Today the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case of Black v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:15 pm
Unfortunately, Wisconsin appealed that decision to the court of appeals, and while it is pending, the court blocked the affidavit option. [read post]
5 May 2017, 8:04 am
It's a poorly reasoned decision, which I can't imagine surviving on appeal. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:33 pm
However, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has suggested that correct legal advice given by a non-lawyer, at least in relatively simple situations, is protected speech under the First Amendment. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:10 pm
Earlier, in Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:32 pm
The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Decision The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed with the Court of Appeals, holding that because the clause in the Agreement restricted Lanning from soliciting, inducing, or encouraging any employee of Manitowoc to leave their employment, it was overbroad, and an unreasonable restriction on Lanning that violated Wis. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:32 pm
The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Decision The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed with the Court of Appeals, holding that because the clause in the Agreement restricted Lanning from soliciting, inducing, or encouraging any employee of Manitowoc to leave their employment, it was overbroad, and an unreasonable restriction on Lanning that violated Wis. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:52 am
The "Wisconsin appeal" is not about remedies in an infringement case but about the enforcement of a FRAND pledge under antitrust and contract laws, such as by asking a court to obligate a SEP holder to make an offer on FRAND terms ("specific performance" of contractual obligations). [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 5:39 am
Members of Wisconsin’s top court need to focus on restoring civility and public trust... [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 9:00 am
An award against the Archdiocese of Milwaukee has been upheld by Wisconsin's Supreme Court to the tune of $16.8 million. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:22 pm
Apple is appealing the dismissal, and Google is appealing certain summary judgment decisions adverse to its interests.Last week the court denied a Google motion to terminate or transfer this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:26 pm
As a practical matter, the court likely will not act on that appeal for some time, possibly until after it rules on the Wisconsin and Maryland gerrymandering cases. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
In defining what qualifies as "express advocacy," "the court should give the benefit of the doubt to speech, not censorship. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 1:27 am
Wisconsin's handling could have been better, but I won't quibble with the court's reasoning. [read post]
