Search for: "Wells v. Place"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 31,990
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2023, 11:00 am
If you like your turkey with a side of copyright infringement, you’ve come to the right place. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 8:58 am
It is a defence to have in place ‘reasonable procedures’ to prevent fraud. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:42 pm
This hearing takes its name from the 1971 Florida Supreme Court case of Richardson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:20 am
Paragraph 2 of the same requires that the assignment of the relevant trademark be "made in writing and shall require the signature of the parties to the contract", and Article 13 of the Implementing Regulation 2018/626 clarifies that the information required pursuant to paragraph 5 shall include the registration number of the mark to be transferred, as well as detailed information on the new holder. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:52 am
Interestingly, the Principles, only refer to “informed consent” in the context of institutionalization (Principle 20.1), though protection of the right to informed consent is well established in international human rights law. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:20 am
See SpaceX v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:34 pm
[6] Goulet V, King LA, Vaillant V, de Valk H. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:04 pm
Paxton and Moody v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:30 am
In essence, the French legislator was aware that technical regulations, which could potentially place additional burdens on importers from other Member States according to the dual burden doctrine (Barnard, p. 87). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:28 am
This was exemplified with Zummo v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
At other places, it can be misleading. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:17 am
” People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:14 am
In Mrkulic v Peters 2023 NY Slip Op 33930(U) November 2, 2023Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 505025/2020Judge Debra Silber points out a vast number of errors that took place before she was assigned to the case. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
Well, sure it is, provided you know nothing about the issue and can’t be bothered to learn. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
[xix] In a second phase, the specific five factors in ASCM Article 15.7 or Article 3.7 of the ADA need to be analysed as well. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:47 am
That case was Maia v IEW Construction and issued from the NJ Appellate Division, Well, the New Jersey Supreme Court has now accepted this case for decision and will decide whether the six-year limitations period is retroactive as concerns the NJ Wage Hour Law and the NJ Wage Payment Law. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” In NAACP v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am
It also mitigates the risk of overcompensation due to the pressure placed on the defendant. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
This method was the method widely used by employers before the Harpur Trust v Brazel judgment. [read post]
