Search for: "dev" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2006, 8:57 am by Ed Sim
  One of the discussion groups that I led with Simon Levene (heads up Corp Dev in Europe for Yahoo and Yair Goldfinger (founder and CTO of ICQ and Dotomi) was titled "Are Internet VCs Dead. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:58 am by Jordan Furlong
@AdrianLurssen: JD Supra co-founder, VP of Strategic Dev. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 3:27 pm by Russell Knight
US Dept. of Housing and Urban Dev., 866 F. 2d 1 – Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit 1989) The bar against attorney’s fees for the self-represented has been held for Illinois divorce cases and their generous attorney’s fees statutes. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney who violates a disciplinary rule may be discharged for cause and is not entitled to fees for any services rendered” (Jay Dietz & Assoc. of Nassau County, Ltd. v Breslow & Walker, LLP, 153 AD3d 503, 506; see Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323, 326; Saint Annes Dev. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:03 am by SHG
Yet, the subtext of the order is that Apple, the maker of the encrypted phone, can be made a slave to the government’s demands, and that the Magistrate Judge has the authority to order a business, unrelated to the commission of any crime, to spend its time and money, expend its devs efforts, to comply with its order, upon pain of contempt. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 3:01 am by SHG
Sure, there will be hackers, devs, coders, geeks who will make this their life’s battle, but they don’t really understand that the law isn’t binary and there are only 10 types of judges. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 10:03 pm by Carl Custer
J Infect Dev Ctries 2011; 5(2):094-105. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:51 am by Dan Bressler
“No Fee If Ethics Breach” “The claim to disgorge legal fees was reinstated by the New York Appellate Division for the Second Judicial Department: ‘An attorney who violates a disciplinary rule may be discharged for cause and is not entitled to fees for any services rendered” (Jay Dietz & Assoc. of Nassau County, Ltd. v Breslow & Walker, LLP, 153 AD3d 503, 506; see Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323, 326; Saint Annes Dev. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
Hecht demonstrated that the Barket defendants were not entitled to contribution by showing that he neither owed a duty to the plaintiff (see Guzman v Haven Plaza Housing Dev. [read post]
  In response to UNOCAL’s argument that it could not be subrogated to a federal agency’s rights, Sojitz pointed to In re Tri-Union Dev. [read post]