Search for: "APPLICATION OF SHARP" Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2009, 5:39 pm
Firstly, this point ought to be seen only in association with the number of applicants since a lower number of applicants would be a likely explanation for the fewer number of successful candidates. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Bowker v Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, heard 21 October 2010 (Sharp J). [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am by INFORRM
On 28 April 2010, Sharp J gave judgment in the case of Dee v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB), granting summary judgment to the defendant. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
 The judicial review application was dismissed. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am by INFORRM
The applications were adjourned to 31 January. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
So application under s.85(2) or (4) would still be required, unless the tenant waits for a replacement tenancy under H&RA 2008. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday, 16 November 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat heard an application in the case of BWN v MWB – this is believed to be the same case in which Mrs Justice Sharp gave a public judgment on 13 April 2011 and, we understand, another on 20 April 2011. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
On 29 June 2012, Tugendhat J heard an application to strike out a libel claim in Mayer v Hoar. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Media news has been dominated by industry reaction to the arrests of Sun journalists in Operation Elveden, which Inforrm covered in several posts, including a discussion on ‘The Sun, Press Freedom and the “Freedom of Speech League Table”‘, Brian Cathcart on ‘The Sun, The baby and the bathwater’ and Julian Petley on how ‘the Sun has eroded British justice, fairness and freedom: now it is feeling the effects”. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 23 July 2019 Mann J heard an application by the Claimants in the case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
That application was determined against the claimant. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
On 17 and 18 April 2018 the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Economou v Freitas. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 21 and 22 January 2019 Warby J heard an application in the case of Arcadia Group Ltd & ors v Telegraph Media Group Ltd. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:26 pm by Robert Chesney
  Apparently the judge later asked, at oral argument, about this seeming discrepancy, and was told that the DHS tool was not universally applicable, and in any event ran a serious risk of triggering the loss of data on the [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  Likewise, in Hobby Lobby, the plaintiffs and their amici (including Senator McCain) are urging the Court not only to allow commercial for-profit enterprises to raiseRFRA claims, but also to grant the requested exemptions­—that is to say, they are urging the Court to make a sharp break from its unbroken doctrine. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
 Now the EPO has 7,000 staff members and 240,000 applications with 65% of applications coming from outside Europe. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 9:48 pm
A New YorkProbate Lawyer said notwithstanding the parties' sharp disagreement about the immediate circumstances in which the 2006 Retainer was negotiated, the facts leading to such negotiations are essentially undisputed, and, to the extent relevant here, they are traced below. [read post]
27 May 2019, 12:36 am
Such techno-libertarian trend is nowadays in sharp contrast with the response of the legal system to such crises in the financial sector. [read post]