Search for: "Austin v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2013, 5:22 am
” At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Brian Netter and Dan Himmelfarb discuss the brief filed by the United States in Fifth Third Bancorp. v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 6:33 pm
Austin v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:17 am
V. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:23 am
To clarify the complex issue of internet sales taxes, the 2018 Supreme Court case South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
University of Texas at Austin, a challenge to the university's affirmative action program. ? [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:31 am
Holder and Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Thursday, February 7, 2019 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Financial reporting, GAAP, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Amicus Brief of Law and Finance Professors in Verition Partners v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:15 pm
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:30 pm
In a 2013 paper, Kevin V. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Hotchkiss v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Hotchkiss v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:41 pm
LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 6:24 am
Seuss v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 8:06 am
The case, Phillips v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:37 am
However, the state prosecutors' association's board is dominated by rural DAs pushing more regressive agendas, with key staff held over from the era when Chuck Rosenthal and John Bradley dominated the group's politics. [read post]
22 May 2013, 2:18 pm
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision soon in Fisher v. [read post]