Search for: "Baker v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,909
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2008, 4:40 am
Baker, 45 F.3d 837, 844-845 (4th Cir. 1995); United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm
Every other state supreme court to consider such a claim has rejected it, as Justice Baker described in her dissent. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 8:14 pm
More than five decades ago, the “one-person, one-vote” rulings of the Warren Court, especially Baker v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:51 pm
Debra Baker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:37 pm
And the freedom guaranteed each and every business, no matter how small, is the freedom to compete - to assert with vigor, imagination, devotion, and ingenuity whatever economic muscle it can muster.United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
From the point of view of the four states involved in the cases, their lawyers apparently will not be prevented from making arguments on two points to try to help them salvage their bans: first, the Supreme Court settled that issue in a summary ruling in 1972 in the case of Baker v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
That turned up cases applying the same rationale under federal law: Baker v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 4:59 am
Lopez v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:29 am
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has licensed virtually unlimited expansion of federal criminal law in cases such as Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
However, the Court was not satisfied there was any flaw in the Council's decision making. 'Due regard' under s.71 Race Relations Act meant appropriate in the circumstances ( Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141), including the countervailing factors. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
However, the Court was not satisfied there was any flaw in the Council's decision making. 'Due regard' under s.71 Race Relations Act meant appropriate in the circumstances ( Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141), including the countervailing factors. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am
Yesterday, in Trump v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 4:34 pm
The second common issue in the cases is the impact, if any, on the new cases of a 1972 Supreme Court decision, Baker v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
The Court should have perhaps established a ‘litmus test’ setting out criteria to determine instances when one has been “prejudiced enough” something akin to the balancing test set out in the American case, Baker v Wingo[22]. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm
This is not a difficult problem of interpretation, the company says, contrasting a classic example of how the word “dozen” may in fact mean 12 or 13 (a baker’s dozen), justifying hearing evidence about what parties intended. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 5:02 am
Similarly, in Baker v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
Lessons For Privacy Advocates and Website Operators From Amazon Cookie Litigation – New York lawyer Gerald Ferguson of Baker Hostetler on the firm’s Data Privacy Monitor He “Likes” Me, He “Likes” Me Not – Facebook’s Sponsored Stories Lawsuit, Fraley v. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 11:48 am
In Willie Eaton v. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 11:48 am
In Willie Eaton v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm
As a preliminary matter, the court concluded that each of the plaintiffs had standing as to at least one defendant, and the court declined to view Baker v. [read post]
