Search for: "Barrett v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
Group 48, LP v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:58 pm
The Supreme Court heard telephonic argument on Monday in Salinas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 am
In 2019, in Rucho v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm
California v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:23 am
Citing a series of California and federal cases (including Barrett v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:48 am
As Justice Blackmun presciently stated in his dissent in Webster v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:43 am
The justices’ eventual opinion in Mississippi v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:37 pm
Both Justices Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett suggested collapsing the test into a single inquiry deriving from South Carolina v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm
Supreme Court’s (SCOTUS) decision overruling Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:23 am
Looking primarily at the plain language of the statute, and guided by the 2006 California case of Barrett v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:03 am
" Barrett v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 12:54 pm
See Barrett v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 1:40 pm
Whether McGirt v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:07 am
(Also see: Barrett v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am
Amy Coney Barrett’s Judicial Philosophy Doesn’t Hold Up to Scrutiny By Angus King Jr., United States Senator, Maine and Heather Cox Richardson, Professor of History, Boston College Angus King Jr. and Heather Cox Richardson argue against originalism—the method of legal interpretation that favors interpreting the Constitution or laws based strictly on their original meaning—and for an interpretative philosophy that looks to the ideals and intent of the… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am
Ct. 2783 (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935); Nortz v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm
” ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare David Priess shared a Lawfare live event with the Michael V. [read post]