Search for: "Blog Editorial"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 3,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times praises the Court’s decision in Reichle v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:52 am
If you care to dive deeper, these appear to be the stories: part 1 ;and part 2. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
” The editorial board of the the Riverside (Calif.) [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:56 am
By Nicole Flatow, cross-posted from American Constitution Society Although many prominent legal leaders, editorial boards and commentators have long lamented the high number of judicial vacancies plaguing our courts, it is not easy for those removed from the process to understand how judicial nominations work, and what impact these empty seats ; have on our justice system. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:05 pm
A call for papers that may be of interest to blog readers:Special Issue on The Neuroscience of Decision Making and the Law Behavioral Sciences and the Law announces a forthcoming special issue on the neuroscience of decision making and the law, to be co-edited by Steven K. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:30 pm
We would like to welcome our guest bloggers for the month of June to the Faculty Blog. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:30 pm
We would like to welcome our guest bloggers for the month of June to the Faculty Blog. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:34 am
Briefly: - ; The editorial board of the Albany Times-Union urges the Court to televise its proceedings, reasoning that “opening itself up to audio recordings doesn’t come close to meeting the 21st-century standard of openness. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 1:53 pm
And, now, also watching! [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 6:15 am
One could argue that it is easier for law schools to suggest the transition to electronic only, open access publication because law school publishing is a unique model, where students do the editorial work and there is very little profit motive behind the publications. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
Readers of this blog may be interested to know that the December issue of the German Law Journal is a memorial issue in honor of David Currie.Reprinted below is the editorial introduction to the issue by Russell Miller: On October 15, 2007, long-time University of Chicago law professor David P. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:47 am
One tweeter has even written an ‘Open Letter’ to the trial judge…. flayman BLOG: An open letter to judge Jacqueline Davies http://bit.ly/cqljEW #TwitterJokeTrial And here is another Open letter The story even made the New York Times, The Times (The editorial is reported as being favourable to Paul Chambers), Guardian etc etc and it will, no doubt, make the Sundays. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 8:20 am
Hopefully, that will come under s33 (editorial changes) and will not be deemed to be an alteration of a fundamental term – making landlords liable to refund up to two months worth of rent to their tenants! [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
And Lyle Denniston of this blog, Jennie Ryan at JURIST, and Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal all provide coverage of Louisiana v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
” The Washington Post reports on the role played by federal employees in the DOMA litigation, while the editorial board of the Boston Herald calls on the Court to restore the “balanced relationship” between states and the federal government “destroyed” by DOMA. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to Representative F. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
Rory Little analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
But at the same time, this Blog views the system of corporate governance in the United States as insufficient to insure that this occurs. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:45 am
Look no further than Russell Beck's Fair Competition Blog. ? [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
And in light of last week’s decision by the First Circuit invalidating Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (which Lyle covered for this blog), the editorial board of the New York Times argues that although “[t]he nation would be well-served if the justices let the panel’s ruling stand,” it would be even “[b]etter yet” if Congress would “just repeal the dreadful law. [read post]
