Search for: "Bush v. Bush" Results 1281 - 1300 of 6,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2008, 7:07 pm
On September 25, 2008, the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (the “Act”) was signed into law by President Bush. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 10:27 pm
He is proving that he is running for Bush's third term. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 11:23 pm by Shams Hirji
  The late Judge Merritt joined Judge Clay’s opinion and Judge Bush dissented. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Choper Distinguished Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley School of Law“A readable field guide to Citizens United, Bush v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
In Rahman Lord Bingham and Lord Roger agreed with the decision in Gamble and held that D2 was not liable: it was as if two new people had jumped out of the bushes and murdered the victim. [read post]
18 May 2023, 12:50 pm
The district court found largely in favor of the environmental group, the losers appealed to the Ninth Circuit, and in a split opinion, the Trump and Bush appointees (Judges Forrest and Ikuta) found in favor of Rosemont and said that the jaguar shouldn't be protected at all, whereas the Biden appointee (Judge Holly Thomas) thought that the jaguar should be protected but that a remand was required to evaluated the potential impacts of the copper mine.Here's the (potential) upside… [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 8:39 am by Lyle Denniston
Bush (and in a companion case, Al-Odah v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 11:34 pm
Summary: On July 30, 2008, President Bush signed into law H.R. 3221, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (the "Act"). [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Bush administration in lawsuits over terrorism policies and interrogation of detainees. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 5:07 pm
Two Reagan appointees (Kozinski and O'Scannlain), a Bush I appointee (Rymer), two Bush II appointees (Callahan and Randy Smith), and -- in a somewhat surprising swing vote capacity -- Judge McKeown. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:47 am
Masuga, No. 138983-4, a medical malpractice case, for reconsideration in light of the Court's recedent decisions in Bush v. [read post]