Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 51,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2012, 7:57 am
Filed under: Attorney/Lawyer, Criminal Law, Evidence Tagged: forfeiture of constitutional right, Michigan Court of Appeals, People v Vaughn [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 8:35 pm
With oral argument scheduled for Monday in Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
Holder v State differs from the cases above because it illustrates privacy concerns that arise from tracking someone through their cell site location information. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
The Court utilized a wide definition of indirect identification advocated in Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Case C-582/14). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:05 am
In Lesterhuis v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The decision, People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 8:26 am
R (Lewis) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council; [2008] WLR (D) 246 “Where, in relation to a question whether user of land had been user as of right, the issue of deference arose as between a landowner and other people making use of the land, the question was how the position would have appeared to the landowner, rather than to the other users, and what would matter to the landowner would be the fact of deference, not the reasons for it. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
R (Moore) v Skipton Fund Ltd [2010] EWHC 3070 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 308 “For the purposes of a claim for an ex gratia payment from public funds, there was nothing irrational or unfair in requiring certain people infected with hepatitis C through treatment with NHS blood or blood products prior to September 1991, to show that spontaneous clearance of the virus after a period of six months had occurred. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:30 pm
The judgement in the case of Beizaras and Levickas v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
However, Dr Butt’s case seems materially different from British Chiropractic Association v Singh ([2011] 1 WLR 133) which was relied on by the Judge. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 8:44 am
Wainwright, in which the Supreme Court held that states must provide counsel to people who cannot afford an attorney in criminal cases. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:36 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:10 am
Would your analysis be altered given the classic exposition of the Ex Post Facto Clause in Calder v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:32 pm
Supreme Court prohibited the execution of the mentally retarded in Atkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:51 am
Some of the cases involve "real" victims, People who have been wronged in some way. [read post]
22 Dec 2024, 7:32 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm
Nixon v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
People v. [read post]
