Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 51,896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am
The case revolves around the “insanity defense,” an ancient doctrine under which people who committed crimes because of their severe mental illness would not be held legally culpable. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm
The court granted review in two other cases on Friday: Williams v. [read post]
28 May 2025, 11:54 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 1:16 pm
”The Illinois Supreme Court in the case People v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:32 pm
Supreme Court prohibited the execution of the mentally retarded in Atkins v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:30 pm
The judgement in the case of Beizaras and Levickas v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 1:12 pm
Crespo v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court’s NetChoice opinion (along with some other boring case people seem to want to talk about), opinions for the October 2023 term appear to be complete. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm
This case emphasises the lesson from Amersi v Leslie [2023] EWHC 1368 (KB) that when approaching the issue of serious harm the tort rules of causation are still in play and should not be overlooked. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 11:35 am
Almost all of the cases that get to the Court of Appeal are -- not surprisingly -- cases in which the search does indeed result in evidence of a crime. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 8:26 am
R (Lewis) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council; [2008] WLR (D) 246 “Where, in relation to a question whether user of land had been user as of right, the issue of deference arose as between a landowner and other people making use of the land, the question was how the position would have appeared to the landowner, rather than to the other users, and what would matter to the landowner would be the fact of deference, not the reasons for it. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
R (Moore) v Skipton Fund Ltd [2010] EWHC 3070 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 308 “For the purposes of a claim for an ex gratia payment from public funds, there was nothing irrational or unfair in requiring certain people infected with hepatitis C through treatment with NHS blood or blood products prior to September 1991, to show that spontaneous clearance of the virus after a period of six months had occurred. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:55 am
People v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:57 pm
The trial court recalls nothing about the case. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:05 am
In Lesterhuis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
Holder v State differs from the cases above because it illustrates privacy concerns that arise from tracking someone through their cell site location information. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:29 pm
He would often note that the law about concealed weapons in Virginia "still comes from a case about whether a gun in a saddlebag counts. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Even more so given that the overwhelming majority of criminal cases end with plea bargains.The California Supreme Court decides the issue. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:42 pm
Not relevant here, since this is an otherwise straightforward "four year old child" type of case. [read post]
