Search for: "Class Action Defense"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 12,819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2009, 5:03 am
Plaintiffs in 14 of the remaining class actions, filed in at least 11 different states, moved the district court to certify their lawsuits as class actions (or as collective actions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)), id., at 1-2. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:17 am
Defense attorneys argued that because CAFA permits a single defendant to remove an entire class action, the district court erred in remanding the class action to state court because Shell and Tesoro failed to include each other in their separate notices of removal. , at 1207. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:17 am
Defense attorneys removed the class action to federal court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), id., at 1108. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:21 am
The Review is a joint project of the firm's Employment Class Action, Class Action Defense, Antitrust, Data Privacy, and practice teams and is the fruit of collaborative efforts of numerous attorneys from across the firm. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 8:35 pm
The Los Angeles Times reports today that CB Richard Ellis Group has agreed to pay upwards of $150,000 per female employee under a class action settlement of a lawsuit alleging sexual harassment. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:50 am
Two years later, defense attorneys moved the trial court to decertify the class. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 5:07 am
Defense attorneys removed the class action to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), id. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 6:09 am
Prior to certification of the litigation as a class action, plaintiffs moved to compel Belaire to produce the names and addresses of all current and former employees; defense attorneys objected on the grounds of the absent class members’ right to privacy under the California Constitution. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 2:08 am
This is the first defense-side argument for a new way of looking at class aggregation, and that alone makes it worthy of study. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:20 am
Defense attorneys removed the class action to federal court under CAFA (Class Action Fairness Act); plaintiff moved to remand the class action to state court (Rynearson I). [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:39 am
Defense attorneys opposed class action treatment, arguing inter alia that common questions do not predominate. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:49 am
Plaintiff moved the district court to certify the litigation as a class action and defense attorneys moved for summary judgment; the district court “granted summary judgment as to Target and denied class certification. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
Again, trying to look at this objectively I think the dissent’s view is more consistent with fundamental principles of class action law. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
Cocchi The post Class Action Defense Cases–KPMG v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:21 am
Following the filing of a consolidated class action complaint, defense attorneys filed a motion for summary judgment; simultaneously, the parties participated in settlement discussions. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
The district court dismissed the first amended class action complaint without prejudice, but defense attorneys challenged the second amended class action complaint also for failure to meet the pleading requirements of the PSLRA. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:03 am
Amount in Controversy Required for Removal Jurisdiction under CAFA (Class Action Fairness Act) not Defeated by Plaintiff’s Statement in Class Action Complaint that Damages “May” not Exceed $5 Million Kansas Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a class action lawsuit in Kansas state court against BP America on behalf of royalty owners alleging that BP engaged in self-dealing and “failed to properly… [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:07 pm
Defense attorneys moved the district court for judgment on the pleadings as to the class action claims under Rule 12(c) on the ground that the class action claims are preempted by federal law. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 12:06 pm
Defense attorneys argued that because plaintiffs had not suffered any injury from the use of Vioxx, the class action claims failed as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 9:05 pm
Class Action Complaint Against Amazon Challenging Shipping and Handling Fees Satisfied Rule 23 Requirements for Class Action Treatment California Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action against Amazon.com alleging violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA); specifically, the class action complaint alleged that Amazon, in addition to receiving “a… [read post]
