Search for: "Close v. U. S"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Tal v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Chapter Readings· U. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:28 am
Take Hanley v Hanley, 2019 NY Slip Op 50970(U) [Sup Ct Albany County June 13, 2019], in which Justice Richard M. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
The Pirate Party, as the name implies, is closely tied to promoting piracy using the tiresome shibboleth of “sharing culture” in the words of Ms. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:05 am
Halperin v Van Dam 2020 NY Slip Op 31301(U) April 28, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652124/2019 Judge: Andrea Masley explains why the attorneys remain in the case. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
Washington, 541 U. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:15 pm
Posner, The Federal Trade Commission, 37 U. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:03 am
Board of Education, 349 U. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 11:27 am
The Article closes with normative recommendations. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
In Cement Masons Local 780 Pension Fund v Schleifer, 56 Misc 3d 1204 [A], 2017 NY Slip Op 50875 [U] [Sup Ct NY County June 29, 2017], Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla considered these issues in a thoughtful opinion, in which she relied on some relatively infrequently litigated provisions of the Business Corporation Law (“BCL”). [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:41 am
[U]nless a Hotmail user varies from default use, the remote computing service is the only place he or she stores messages, and Microsoft is not storing that user's opened messages for backup purposes. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
(Coverage by: No Fault Paradise; Edwards Angle Palmer & Dodge).Trentacoste v Riverhead Central School District, 2009 NY Slip Op 31112(U) (Sup. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
By Glen Hansen In Brandt Trust v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:27 pm
Dyson, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Hatch-Waxman junkies will surely be watching this case closely. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:29 am
Goodyear Rubber Co., 128 U. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:41 am
One is U.S. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:41 am
One is U.S. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
While Public Resources Code § 21061 – a general definitional statute not cited by OPR in support of its proposal – defines an EIR as “a detailed statement setting forth the matters specified in Sections 21100 and 21100.1[,]” this general reference is of unclear import and per CEQA’s own terms governs “[u]nless the context otherwise requires. [read post]
7 May 2017, 4:27 pm
Al-Nashiri’s main claim is that the commission has no authority over him because the U,S. [read post]
