Search for: "Cross v. Cross"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 21,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 3:41 am
In Melendez Diaz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee and Cross-Appellant. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:42 am
CRESTVIEW APARTMENTS, LH RESIDNETIAL, LLC, and SCOTT HACKER, Defendants, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:10 pm
DALTON, Defendants, Appellees and Cross-Appellants. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:26 am
V. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 1:28 pm
Although the People demonstrated due diligence in attempting to locate the victim for trial (see People v Arroyo, 54 NY2d 567, 571, cert denied 456 US 979), the court unduly restricted defense counsel's cross-examination of the victim at the preliminary hearing, and thus the admission in evidence of the preliminary hearing testimony deprived defendant of his right of confrontation (see People v Simmons, 36 NY2d 126, 130-131). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:43 am
See Ohio v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:53 am
' Sosin v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 6:45 am
Case citation: Levitt v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:37 am
[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is...inconsistent with the declarant's testimony, and was given under... [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:59 am
Similar to its federal counterpart, Ohio Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) provides that A statement is not hearsay if...The declarant testifies at trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is... [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:45 pm
Ordinarily leading questions should be permitted on cross-examination. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
To the extent called to the attention of an expert witness upon cross-examination or relied upon by the expert witness... [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:44 am
On June 15, 2012, the Virginia Supreme Court in Richmond denied the Petitions for Rehearing of Travis Burns as Appellant and of Gregory Gagnon as Appellant/Cross-Appellant in the crime victim appeal of Burns v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:39 pm
En dernier lieu, nous briserons le mythe bien enraciné selon lequel contra non valentem ne s’applique pas en droit louisianais de la prescription acquisitive, révélant ainsi une autre convergence de taille entre la France et la Louisiane.Download the article from SSRN at the link. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:01 am
The opinion is styled, Kirstin Walker v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 12:14 am
Trunk v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:17 am
" In United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:04 pm
Smith v. [read post]
