Search for: "Daniel v. State" Results 1281 - 1300 of 5,629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2020, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Today, the Kansas Supreme Court heard arguments about the matter, and promptly issued an opinion (Kelly v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:56 pm by Unknown
  Finally, the Bill states that any language in a first-party insurance policy that conflicts with the Bill’s language is void as against public Policy. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At AlterNet, Bill Blum writes that in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:06 am by Eric Goldman
VIP therefore was entitled to judgment in its favor on the federal and state law dilution claims. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:04 pm
  But I strongly doubt that consumers will think that the dog toy is actually produced by Jack Daniels, if for no other reason than (1) "a tag affixed to the Bad Spaniels toy states that the “product is not affiliated with Jack Daniel Distillery,”" and (2) do you really think Jack Daniels itself would produce a product that says "43% poo by volume? [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Shannon O'Hare
According to US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, the sanctions were issued “for the sale and transport of Venezuela’s crude oil” which violated the existing US sanctions on PDVSA. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter discusses last week’s decision in Comcast v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 9:14 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Written by Daniel Standing LL.B., Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm
United States, 498 U.S. 192, 193 (1991); United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” In a column for the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter “address[es] a rebuke by Chief Justice John G. [read post]