Search for: "Doe v. Doe Governmental Entity" Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2011, 3:56 am
Although a not-for-profit corporation may fall within the definition of an agency subject to FOIL if its purpose is governmental and it has the attributes of a public entity, here, said the court, the record demonstrated that EIC does not have those attributes. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Carol Swain - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm by Roderick Hills - Guest
Does the plain text of the INA settle the case? [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm by Erik J. Heels
* Patent 'Reform' Passes (2011-06-26) There is not much good in this compromise bill, which will soon be signed into law. http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/06/patent-reform-passes.html * Woman Charged With 'Obstructing Governmental Administration' For Filming Police From Her Front Yard (2011-06-26) Welcome to 1984 and #SecurityTheatre.… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:41 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
On June 23, 2011, in a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in IMS Health Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
 [Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-20-201(a) (Supp. 1995)] specifically restates this principle: ‘Except as may be otherwise provided in this chapter, all governmental entities shall be immune from suit for any injury which may result from the activities of such governmental entities wherein such governmental entities are engaged in the exercise and discharge of any of their functions, governmental or proprietary. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
“The Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act (‘the Act’), reaffirms the general rule of immunity from suit for governmental entities, and expressly extends the common-law immunity to proprietary functions. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:56 am by Rick Hasen
  The Court also distinguished the First Amendment right to sign a petition recognized in Doe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:04 pm by James Hamilton
The association urged the FDIC to construe this priority narrowly so it does not extend to quasi-governmental bodies, for example the priority would not cover amounts owed to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.There is a need for a provision comparable to Section 503(b)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, which grants administrative expense status to claims for fees of attorneys and accountants of a creditor that makes a substantial contribution in a bankruptcy case. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
’ Where immunity has been waived, such as for the negligent acts of governmental employees, the governmental entity is the proper party-defendant. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm by Edward A. Fallone
We hold that our separation of powers provision was not intended to apply to local governmental entities and officials, such as those identified in articles VIII and IX and controlled in part by legislative acts. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
§ 29-20-205(4), which does not waive governmental immunity for liability for negligent inspection, does not immunize governmental entity for inspection of property owned and controlled by the governmental entity). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:11 pm by Steve DiJulio
The Telford court considered the following four factors to determine the application of the campaign finance provisions to an entity: 1) the entity’s governmental function; 2) the entity’s government funding; 3) governmental control over the entity; and, 4) the entity’s origin. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:37 pm by Daniel Low
" RECITALS WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Defendant captioned Insignia Systems, Inc. v. [read post]