Search for: "Doe v. Google, Inc."
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Costeja was the data subject, the website containing the material was the data processor, but Google Inc. and Google Spain (Google Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
George Christian, Janet Nocek, Barbara Bailey and Peter Chase — employees or officers of Library Connection, a consortium of libraries in Connecticut — were plaintiffs in Doe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
George Christian, Janet Nocek, Barbara Bailey and Peter Chase — employees or officers of Library Connection, a consortium of libraries in Connecticut — were plaintiffs in Doe v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:43 am
However, injunctive relief has become much rarer following the after the landmark case of eBay Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:49 am
Where does that put Google (and Dover) with its digital scanners? [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
This issue did not need to be decided upon in CG v Facebook Ireland because the DPA was found not to apply. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Doe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Doe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
The Kluwer Copyright Blog has more on the decision by Mr Justice Birss in Warner Music & another v TuneIn Inc [2019] EWHC 2923 (ch). [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:00 pm
A defendant must have aided and abetted (by knowingly providing substantial assistance) another person in the commission of the 4 TWITTER, INC. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 12:09 pm
Noom Inc., et al. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 7:47 am
by guest blogger Riana Pfefferkorn Child sex abuse material, or CSAM, is a longstanding scourge on the Internet. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
Zimmerman (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Copyrights & Campaigns) District Court C D California: IsoHunt told to pull .torrent files offline, likely to close: Columbia Pictures Industries Inc., et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 11:21 am
The Federal Circuit case Marshall’s Locksmith Service Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:55 pm
One of the key issues in this case is likely to be influenced by the England and Wales Court of Appeal’s decision in Google, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
"The IPKat suspects, knowing the parties in question, that this might be yet another round in the Battle of the Bunnies, the chocolate variety at any rate.Moving with great rapidity, on Thursday 17 March the Court is holding its hearing in Case C-236/08, Google France, Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 3 June 2008. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:49 pm
For example, the amicus brief of Google, Amazon, Hewlett-Packard, Red Hat and Yahoo! [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
Case Citation: North Jersey Media Group Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2025, 6:17 pm
T arrived, but was when General Hood went after Google for violating the terms of Google’s nonprosecution agreement on promoting the sale of drugs online and its $500,000,000 fine paid with the stockholders money (for which Google was also sued by shareholders). [read post]
