Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 1281 - 1300 of 12,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
The former opponent referred to the fact that the first page of E3 reads: “Soutenue le 27 Septembre 1995 devant le jury composé de ... [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:02 am by Martin George
French Judgment on Article 5 (1) b of the Brussels I Regulation, Part III On March 27, 2007, the French supreme court for private... [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:55 pm
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 27, 2007 Mr. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:22 am
[para 47]'; (2) A sign may contain a feature that would 'plainly strike the eye of any observer' but does not qualify as an essential characteristic. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 11:30 pm by Nico Cordes
Thus, the central button 8 corresponded to the claimed manual cook button.The board does not agree with this assertion. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 626-27 (2008), does not include the power to forbid gun stores altogether. 3. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
It does so by focussing primarily on colonial lawyers. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 2:07 pm
(London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2001) at 3-27. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:16 pm by Old Fox
"Chapter 9: How to Statisticulate"Does it make sense? [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 2:08 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
The Act provides the following time periods for submitting patent information to FDA, depending on when the patent is granted: With the 505(b)(1) application Within 30 days of approval of the 505(b)(1) application Within 30 days of grant of the patent The Act does not specify any stand-alone consequences for “late” listing or failing to list a patent. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:07 pm
Respondent on April 12, 1994 filed a motion returnable April 27, 1994 seeking re-argument of the dispositional order dated April 7, 1994. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:10 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
It might also fall under the remainder of Art. 13(1), which protects GIs from misuse, evocation, or other misleading practices.The Proposal for a new GI Regulation suggests expanding the existing scope of protection to cases where “a domain name contain[s] or consist[s] of the registered geographical indication” (Art. 27(3). [read post]