Search for: "Ex parte Cross"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,666
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2011, 5:49 pm
Following an ex parte hearing on the matter, a Justice being satisfied that some evidence is received on all essential elements may refer the matter to a set date court at which point the Provincial Crown will decide whether or not to take carriage of the charge. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:51 pm
Ex. 122; see Astbury v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:44 am
I thought that part of my postcard this week should have a judicial theme…. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 1:00 am
R v Redbridge Justice ex parte Ram [1992] 1 ALL ER 652 was a criminal case where it was held that where a bench of two justices hearing an information charging a criminal offence are unable to agree on a verdict they are obliged to adjourn the case for hearing by a bench of three justices so that the duty imposed on the court by s 9(2) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 to either convict the accused or dismiss the information after hearing the evidence and the parties… [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:26 pm
The book is divided in two parts. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 11:16 am
In that case, the ex-husband's forensic accountant, during cross examination, was challenged on the methodology used by the accountant. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:48 am
" Decision as PrecedentialPrededential No. 34: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register "Beer Glass and Stand" Packaging for Lack of Distinctiveness Fraud: Precedential No. 36: TTAB Refuses to Find Fraudulent Intent Where Applicant Relied on Advice of CounselPrecedential No. 16: Fraud Claim Survives Motion to Dismiss; Facts Pleaded with Sufficient ParticularityPrecedential No. 2: TTAB Okays Fraud Pleading But Denies Summary Judgment on Intent Issue Genericness: Precedential No. 45: TTAB Finds… [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:51 pm
In favor of the executioner State ex rel Lykos v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:47 pm
NOTE: it pays to read the footnotes- the following is the entire text of footnote 3 by the court in Milay ex rel YRM v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:05 am
Aidala said in December he was relishing the chance to cross-examine the arresting police officers. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:22 pm
According to reports, ex-Giant Lawrence "L.T. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
Gentry’s crime and sentence, and therefore his conditions of confinement do not constitute ex post facto punishment, and there is no unlawful restraint. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:20 pm
What is the hardest part in estate planning? [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:53 am
s busts, after the jump, we make sure the lawyers involved get full credit for their parts. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Uniloc sued Microsoft over its product activation software, infringing Uniloc's 5,490,216. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
” The Court crossed out the pre-printed language “and therefore liable for damages” and hand-wrote the following: “This is different from determining that they are the publisher solely because of the posting. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:13 pm
” As a result, the Court of Appeals decided the government had not crossed the line.Third, the Court of Appeals held that the district court did not violate the ex post facto clause when it upwardly departed five levels based on a 2009 amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines (Larkin committed the offense in 2002 and was sentenced in 2009). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
HUGH CASSIDY et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants, and Respondents, WILLIAM STRAW, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
HUGH CASSIDY et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants, and Respondents, WILLIAM STRAW, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
Elstad by holding that the deliberate, planned refusal to warn, followed by warnings after confession should be treated the same as the momentary, innocent failure to warn in Elstad; and 3) the Ohio Supreme Court’s ruling that defendant’s confession was voluntary resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of facts presented in the state court proceeding, because the “admonition” that defendant should “cut a deal” was not simply… [read post]
