Search for: "Felts v. Felts" Results 1281 - 1300 of 9,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
In response to a post-trial motion filed in the case of Huertas v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:46 am by Adam Baker
Naylor Group Inc. v Ellis-Don Construction Ltd., [1996] OJ No 3247, 31 CLR (2d) 195 (ON Gen Div), revd [1999] 119 OAC 182 (ONCA), vard 2001 SCC 58, [2001] 2 SCR 943, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2001/2001scc58/2001scc58.html This is not a tender dispute between an owner and a bidder, but between a general contractor and a subcontractor whose prices were used to secure a low bid. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 11:03 pm by Andrew Langille
She felt powerless to reject or take action over the sexual assaults, his behaviour, or the constant harassment. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 11:03 pm by Andrew Langille
She felt powerless to reject or take action over the sexual assaults, his behaviour, or the constant harassment. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The minority felt that the requirement to hold elections at “regular intervals” was secondary to the primary aim of A3P1, which was to ensure that citizens should have a full participative role in the selection of those who would govern them. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 3:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
As there were indications in the Directive that the art 28(2), (3) protections benefited only those enjoying rights of residence, and that art 28(3) is predicated upon the enjoyment of such a right, (and although the majority of the Court felt otherwise) it was open to suggestion that the right in question was right of permanent residence referred to in articles 16, 28(2). [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:53 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The High Court had felt bound by Court of Appeal jurisprudence to hold that English law was applicable, but granted a leapfrog appeal certificate to the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 2:39 pm by Kenneth L. Kunkle
While eventually coming to the conclusion that the original Bratz were developed during Bryant's employment with Mattel, it is interesting to note that the jury felt that these designs fell into the scope of his employment of hair and makeup design.Derivative WorksIn his ruling, Judge Larson said "Mattel has established its exclusive rights to the Bratz drawings, and the court has found that hundreds of the MGA parties' products, including all the currently available core… [read post]