Search for: "Garcia v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
It points out that 83 MEPs from the 6 largest parliamentary groups and from 18 different member states have signed up to the 10 point “WePromiseEU” Charter. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:16 pm
Jose Garcia, I have reason to believe your life is in danger. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 2018 NY Slip Op 08423, Court of AppealsNew York State's Civil Rights Law §50-a requires that police officer personnel records be kept confidential and sets out a procedure to obtain a court order of disclosure of such records. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 2018 NY Slip Op 08423, Court of AppealsNew York State's Civil Rights Law §50-a requires that police officer personnel records be kept confidential and sets out a procedure to obtain a court order of disclosure of such records. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:29 am
Although both parties attempted to rely upon the court’s earlier decision upholding the constitutionality of the ordinance, Garcia v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 8:17 am
For example, in Garcia v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 8:17 am
For example, in Garcia v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Garcia-Hernandez v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:02 pm
Garcia, 474 F.3d 994 (7th Cir. 2007)). [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:52 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:38 pm
In Garcia v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:09 am
The case of Garcia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Garcia, 17-834 Issues: (1) Whether the Immigration Reform and Control Act expressly pre-empts the states from using any information entered on or appended to a federal Form I-9, including common information such as name, date of birth, and social security number, in a prosecution of any person (citizen or alien) when that same, commonly used information also appears in non-IRCA documents, such as state tax forms, leases, and credit applications; and (2) if IRCA bars the… [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 8:02 am
Circuit ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:15 am
In Washington this is fatal.The case is Knight v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 4:57 pm
It means simply “deserving of reproof or rebuke”. [11] That broader meaning of reprehensible was endorsed in Garcia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
Garcia, 928 S.W.2d 307, 310 (Tex. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
Garcia, 928 S.W.2d 307, 310 (Tex. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Reed v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
California and United States v. [read post]
