Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 67,507
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 5:03 am
Given the recent debate following City of Ontario v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
Three arguments were given for fixing the success fee at once. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
Finally, Part V summarizes the implications of the Trump v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:13 pm
Here's the latest chapter in the Skyland Shopping Center saga that has given us Franco v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:56 pm
This week, the Tennessee Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Wheelock v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:18 am
The 2nd DCA recently heard the case of Jose Ferrer v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:43 pm
The Court of Appeal says that it "elected to proceed with the opinion given because the appeal was fully briefed and raised important issues. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm
See, generally, Roper v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 3:57 am
An excerpt: The Supreme Court’s decision in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 9:43 am
In Puppolo v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 1:53 pm
A recent, unpublished legal decision (Rapid Settlements v. [read post]
Clarke v. Hassan, 2011 ONSC 467 (S.C.J.) (Rule 29.1 – discovery plan, Rule 53.03 – expert witnesses)
17 May 2011, 12:51 pm
The discovery plan, agreed to by the plaintiff, specified that the plaintiff would be produced for discovery by the third party on a given date and would provide [...] [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:09 pm
Banks v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:42 pm
They'll say anything.(3) Given (2), trial courts should think a ton about appointing a neutral expert. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 2:17 pm
Given the various admonitions and other curative efforts here, the Court of Appeal holds that there was no prejudice in not ordering a mistrial.Still: Freaky, eh? [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
The jury finds that Andreasen was sane, and given the evidence, I'm okay with that.As I am with the fact that I'll no longer see Andreasen walking the streets of San Diego, wondering if and when he'd randomly kill again. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:26 pm
That the Ninth Circuit's cases on the relevant issue were themselves confusing.And then Judge Silverman bothers to repeatedly formulate -- and write down -- the proper instructions that should be given at the retrial on remand. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 10:54 am
Lo stole from his employer -- gets him a little shy of six years in prison.And given his plea agreement and waiver, his appeal is dismissed. [read post]
