Search for: "Good v. Good" Results 1281 - 1300 of 76,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Following on from this post and this post, here's another bad idea for those who don't like paying child support.Let me tell you about the case of Heck v Heck, heard recently by the Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 1:09 am
"There may be instances in which an individual who has been determined to be a vexatious litigant finds himself having to defend against an action," Justice Cynthia Aaron wrote in Mahdavi v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 6:15 am
The Sixth Circuit holds that the good faith exception does not apply to Title III wiretaps. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 2:15 am by Nedim Malovic
However, since some of the goods covered by the marks are aimed primarily at a public of professionals, the level of attention of that public (with regard to those goods) will be higher than that of the general public (T-449/15, Satkirit Holdings v OHIM).Comparison of the goodsAs regards the assessment of lighting mixers in Class 9 covered by the earlier mark and the goods in Class 11 covered by the Applicant’s mark, the General Court observed that it was… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:42 pm by James Yang
Blurred patent scope good for both patent owner and accused infringer In Meadwestvaco v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 11:42 pm by GWS Law
Sometimes they are simply wrong (eg KU (A Child) v LCC [2005] EWCA Civ 475). [read post]