Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 1281 - 1300 of 68,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2008, 4:07 am
Law Week's Supreme Court Today is reporting that the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in HIF Bio Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:28 am by Robert Chesney
Back in September I noted that the Supreme Court granted cert. in a pair of state-secrets privilege (“SSP”) cases, General Dynamics v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
Two years ago, in Honeycutt v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Wells C. Bennett
Yesterday, Judge John Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the government’s motion for summary judgment in the case of Kadi v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:07 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Judge Hayes of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California today issued this ruling on the dispositive motions in Martin v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:14 am by William Helbling
In a 5-4 decision, the high court granted the divorce order citing to the recent US Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 11:37 am by John Elwood
The Supreme Court cleared out a lot of relisted cases this week, granting review in Servotronics, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
Supreme Court granted certiorari in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:57 am
The court overturned a ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit [official website] in Wilson v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 4:36 am by Barry Sookman
In an important decision, Judge William Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California partially granted and partially denied motions to dismiss in the case of Andersen et al. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am by Charlie French (Bristows)
Although the Court of Appeal stated in Ocado v AutoStore that the interest of the general public usually arises after a decision is rendered, the position was different in this case as it might be too late for Nicoventures to use the information in the EPO proceedings if access was not granted immediately. [read post]