Search for: "Hill v. State" Results 1281 - 1300 of 5,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Julie Rovner of Governing reports that many states are poised to ban abortion, if Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:57 am by Mark S. Humphreys
It happens in Grand Prairie, Weatherford, Arlington, Dallas, Fort Worth, Roanoke, Keller, Colleyville, North Richland Hills, Grapevine, and all over the state. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 7:44 pm by Michael O'Hear
  As the state put it in the cert. petition, “But this sort of prejudice — the perceived prejudice associated with a longer sentence — is not the sort of prejudice that Hill [v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 8:39 am by Mark S. Humphreys
" This was stated in the 1937, Texas Supreme Court case, Universal Life & Accident Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:55 am by Meg Martin
Hill delivered the decision.C.J. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 7:53 am by Robert Kraft
The Hill reports that Lambda Legal said the Justice Department announced the policy change in federal court on Thursday, “more than a month after the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:48 am by chrislaughton@mercerhole.co.uk
Like me (but he expresses it far more eloquently in Virtualpurple), Norris J prefers the decision of HHJ McCahill QC in Hill v Stokes Plc [2010] EWHC 3726. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon Civic… [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Second, the federal RFRA is unconstitutional when applied to state law under Boerne v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d at 10; Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d at 271-272). [read post]