Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 69,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2020, 9:53 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 8:32 am
For years, voting rights advocates have tried to make lemonade from lemons, arguing that the Equal Protection holding of Bush v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 8:55 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in WesternGeco LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 6:01 am
In Wisconsin, Democrats hold virtually every statewide office, including governor. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 1:10 am
The case is Ohio v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 5:30 pm
Real property — Counterclaim — Rightful owners The property dispute at the center of these cases began in 2006 and has generated several different state court actions in Maryland, as well as in U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 1:31 pm
(U.S.S.C., April 24, 2018, Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:25 am
Virginia State Bd. of Elections McCrory v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
Supreme Court granted the State's cert. petition in Indiana v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 12:51 pm
Allen Myers LP v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Valencia Holding Co., LLC, 201 Cal.App.4th 74 (2011). [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:15 pm
HTI IP v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
That argument stems from a New York State Court of Appeals ruling, Hoffman v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:31 am
Triple Canopy, holding that the Government had properly alleged an implied certification claim under the standard articulated by the Supreme Court in Universal Health Servs. v. [read post]
New Judgment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
26 Jul 2017, 2:39 am
To determine the initial criterion, the Supreme Court held that the burden of proof of establishing that the proposed marriage is one of convenience falls on the Secretary of State. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 3:33 am
State v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:45 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
