Search for: "House v. House" Results 1281 - 1300 of 41,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2009, 6:04 am
House Passes Senate Bill Strengthening Securities Fraud and Financial Fraud EnforcementThe House passed, as amended, a Senate bill to improve enforcement of securities fraud and financial institution fraud involving asset-backed securities and fraud related to federal assistance and relief programs. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 6:52 am
The Scottish Government has published a consultation paper on its proposal to introduce legislation before the summer recess in order to overturn the House of Lords' 17 October 2007 decision (Rothwell v Chemical Insulating Company Ltd [2007] UKHL 39) that asymptomatic pleural plaques are not compensable (click here to view further information on this judgment). [read post]
30 May 2020, 3:28 pm
The inaugural issue of the Intergovernmental Organisations In-House Counsel Journal (no. 1, May 2020) is out. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:26 am
The complaint (full text) in National Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
SCOTUS on Tuesday decided Lozman v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Pippa Rogerson (Cambridge University) has written a short casenote in the latest issue of the Cambridge Law Journal on the judgment of the House of Lords in Harding v Wealands [2006] UKHL 32. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 3:37 pm
The claimants were two software houses, one English and the other American, which were at [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 1:16 pm
  But at least after today's opinion, in-house counsel are forewarned:Get it in writing. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 11:07 pm
Washington D.C. is "the window through which the world looks into our house," wrote the Justice Department in the Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Brown v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am by Sarah Waller
Sutton v Norwich (2021) EWCA Civ 20, on appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (2020) UKUT 0090 (LC), 20th March 2020. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:24 am
As a consequence, the Inner House of the Court of Session found that the Act was not an infringement of ECHR Article 1 Protocol 1. [read post]